Skip to main contentLink to External Link Policy

Because of a lapse in Government funding, the information on this website may not be up to date, transactions submitted via the website may not be processed, and the agency may not be able to respond to inquiries until appropriations are enacted.

The NIH Clinical Center (the research hospital of NIH) is open. For more details about its operating status, please visit cc.nih.gov.

Updates regarding Government operating status and resumption of normal operations can be found at OPM.gov.

Crafting Your Research Proposal

Step 1: The Idea

Step 2: Choosing an Institute and Center (IC) and Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA)

  • Does your idea fit with IC-specific priorities?
  • What’s the best FOA for you?
    • Scientific focus and scope of FOA
    • Career stage
    • What ICs are signed on?

Step 3: Developing Specific Aims

  • Must contain everything important and exciting about your project and be clear and concise
    • Set up the problem and/or need and/or gap
    • Describe a possible solution—may include “long-term goal” and “immediate objective”
    • Provide a snapshot of your research strategy
    • Develop theory and/or hypothesis-driven specific aims (approximately 2 to 3)
    • Connect the potential impact of your research to IC-specific priorities
  • For Career Development Awards: briefly describe training and your long-term potential to impact the field;  
    where does this project lead?

Step 4: Developing the Research Proposal

  • Read the FOA carefully to ensure a complete application that addresses all review criteria!!
  • Significance = Set up the problem and/or need and/or gap and the potential of your study to be impactful (but be fair with previous literature—no cherry-picking); set up the theoretical perspective of the application
  • Innovation = How your proposed approach is novel
  • Approach = What you plan to do in as much detail as possible
    • Preliminary data and/or experience
    • Describe participants, study design, measures
    • Statistical analyses (connect to aims) 
    • Study timeline
    • Potential problems and alternative strategies (justify choices)
    • Potential impact (end on a high note)

Step 5: Develop Candidate Section (for Career Development [K] Awards)

  • Candidate background = Your background and commitment to a research career
  • Career goals = Logical progression to independence, but highlight need for additional training
  • Career development plan = Specific training plan with timeline, courses and/or workshops, mentor meetings, etc.

Step 5: Refine Aims and Proposal!

  • Review and get advice from mentors, colleagues, external reviewers, friends, family, etc.
  • Plan time for many revisions

Step 6: Dealing With Revisions If Not Funded

  • Talk over the summary statement with a program officer, mentors, and colleagues to identify major vs. minor critiques
  • Identify major themes of critiques to address in one-page response
  • Restart the proposal development process with critiques in mind!

Talking With Program Officers

  • Contact us early! 
    • Provide the FOA you are considering
    • Send the draft concept or draft aims
    • Provide several times you are available for a call over the next 2 weeks
  • Contact us more than once!
    • You may want brief discussion on the overall fit of your topic with IC priorities, then a more in-depth discussion of developed aims later
    • You may want to contact more than one IC to 
      • Gauge enthusiasm
      • Ask for other potential program officers to contact if you get a “not interested”
  • Topics to discuss pre-application
    • Advice on which FOA to use—needed qualifications, fit with research focus
    • Advice on specific aims—align with purpose and/or scope of the FOA and programmatic priorities
    • Advice on the study section (if going to the Center for Scientific Review)
    • Characteristics of applications that score well for that FOA
  • Topics to discuss post-review (wait until the summary statement is released)
    • Feedback on summary statement
    • Score (in fundable range? Is resubmission appropriate?)
    • Response to the summary statement (is there an opportunity to submit a response to the summary statement to the program officer?)
    • Preparation for resubmission